Talk:Filibuster

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Filibuster article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Filibuster was copied or moved into Filibuster in the United States with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 23 to 29, 2013

Etymology

According to https://www.etymonline.com/word/filibuster the word comes from Dutch vrijbueter (now vrijbuiter) "freebooter". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.202.155 (talk) 10:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also in the wikipedia article on filibuster (military) - yet the two uses come from the same source. That can't be right. -- Beardo (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo Correction

Mark Page here: I believe there is a typo (years vs days). Under the United Kingdom heading, at the end of the paragraph beginning with 'In January 2011' the text reads '8 years' and should read '8 days' as the Filibuster debate had reached it's 8th day according to the article.

Hope this is correct.

Thank you,

Mark Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.184.203.6 (talk) 16:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed TJRC (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Example from Poland

By the definition of the filibuster it doesn't seem to even qualify as such. Postponing the vote within permitted, but limited, amount of time is not a debate. Filibuster is specific to the debate. If you'd qualify any and every example of postponing the vote as a "filibuster" you'd have examples flooded with just that throughout the history of the democracies, as it's a common practice. SkywalkerPL (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese ox walk Walk

Is it worth adding a section on the ox walk of the Japanese Diet?

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2020/01/31/commentary/japan-commentary/ox-walking-heckling-strange-diet-practices/

--Patbahn (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Ontario Canada filibuster naming all lakes, rivers, etc.

A transcript is here https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/house-documents/parliament-35/session-1/1991-05-06/hansard#PARA385

24.141.211.239 (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should mention that there is an existing link to the transcript in the sources http://hansardindex.ontla.on.ca/hansardeissue/35-1/l028.htm, however it doesn't provide paragraph IDs to allow direct linking to the Zebra Mussels Act, and it's using the HTTP protocol, rather than HTTPS, so the existing link may cause issues with some browsers and security settings. 2001:1970:4D1E:6B00:D9EE:66FD:6E0A:5649 (talk) 00:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]